|
|
Post by avenue on Jun 17, 2017 0:12:26 GMT -5
mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2017-06-17/doc-ifyhfnqa4387018.shtml this is according to a chinese website. few months ago,either late 2016 or early 2017,back issue of kanwa. sukhoi told Kanwa they been approached by shenyang to redesign J-15,the aircraft itself is based on SU-33.according to there proposal.the improve variant will adapt aft center of gravity or "releaxed static stability" thus J-15 do not need forward canard to achieve manuevirity..equally simplify the production process. according to kanwa.sukhoi admited SU-33 is very complicate and expensive to produce.that why it was abandoned.Shenyang more likely.like the russian encounter similiar problem.
|
|
deino
Full Member
Posts: 143
|
Post by deino on Jun 20, 2017 6:39:31 GMT -5
Since when is KANWA a reliable source  Also why should SAC ask Sukhoi to redesign an illegally copied Su-27K ?? ... and even more why should Sukhoi react to this request ? IMO pure BS. |
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 3, 2017 15:46:13 GMT -5
mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2017-06-17/doc-ifyhfnqa4387018.shtml this is according to a chinese website. few months ago,either late 2016 or early 2017,back issue of kanwa. sukhoi told Kanwa they been approached by shenyang to redesign J-15,the aircraft itself is based on SU-33.according to there proposal.the improve variant will adapt aft center of gravity or "releaxed static stability" thus J-15 do not need forward canard to achieve manuevirity..equally simplify the production process. according to kanwa.sukhoi admited SU-33 is very complicate and expensive to produce.that why it was abandoned.Shenyang more likely.like the russian encounter similiar problem. Sina is extremely inaccurate! I remember them bashing the J-15 4 years ago for its alleged inability to carry heavy payloads (Flopping Fish is the name). This website actively quotes trash American outlets like "National Interest" or some garbage like that. |
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 3, 2017 15:48:53 GMT -5
mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2017-06-17/doc-ifyhfnqa4387018.shtml this is according to a chinese website. few months ago,either late 2016 or early 2017,back issue of kanwa. sukhoi told Kanwa they been approached by shenyang to redesign J-15,the aircraft itself is based on SU-33.according to there proposal.the improve variant will adapt aft center of gravity or "releaxed static stability" thus J-15 do not need forward canard to achieve manuevirity..equally simplify the production process. according to kanwa.sukhoi admited SU-33 is very complicate and expensive to produce.that why it was abandoned.Shenyang more likely.like the russian encounter similiar problem. Sounds like bulls**t to me. Why would the SAC approach Sukhoi when they themselves are much further than the Russians ever were with the Su-33. Sina often quotes unreliable sources such as Kanwa or National Interest, so I would take them pretty lightly. |
|
|
|
Post by SSDD on Aug 3, 2017 22:38:57 GMT -5
There are reports that the next "Flanker" version might have drastic changes (as compared to the basic Flanker design).
Have you heard of anything like that, Huitong?
|
|
|
|
Post by capucigpewo on Apr 12, 2019 18:12:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ubijihe on Apr 12, 2019 20:36:03 GMT -5
|
|
Also why should SAC ask Sukhoi to redesign an illegally copied Su-27K ?? ... and even more why should Sukhoi react to this request ?